Prohibition in the UK

Grey Clouds Over Blighty

Cannabis prohibition in the United Kingdom has been a contentious and often debated topic for decades. At this moment, British people have found themselves in a bit of a grey area courtesy of confusing reports of potential legislation changes and the pitfalls of accessing prescriptions privately (which does not guarantee to escape the long arm of the law). So, let’s consider the historical context, key figures, and the impact of cannabis prohibition in the UK from its inception to some potential future developments concerning its slowly weakening grip.

 

The historical context of cannabis prohibition in the United Kingdom can be traced back to the early 20th century. The first significant step towards criminalizing cannabis in the United Kingdom was taken with the enactment of the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1920. This pivotal legislation classified cannabis as a dangerous and harmful substance, thereby setting the stage for its prohibition. It is worth noting that this act was heavily influenced by international drug control treaties, most notably the 1912 Hague International Opium Convention.

 

During this period, there were key figures who played significant roles in shaping the perception of cannabis and advocating for its prohibition. One influential figure was Dame Mabel Masters, a physician and a strong advocate for drug control. Masters believed that the use of cannabis led to moral degeneration and the deterioration of public health. Her efforts led to the inclusion of cannabis in the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1920.

 

Another key figure was Sir William Beveridge, a social reformer who investigated the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report 1894. The report highlighted the relatively lower risks associated with cannabis compared to other substances, such as opium and alcohol. However, Beveridge's recommendations were ignored, and cannabis continued to be stigmatized as a dangerous drug.

 

The impact of cannabis prohibition in the United Kingdom has been multilayered, affecting various aspects of society. On one hand, proponents argue that prohibition has helped maintain public health and safety by discouraging cannabis use. They say that cannabis can have negative effects on mental health, especially in vulnerable individuals, and can lead to dependency.

 

However, critics of cannabis prohibition suggest that it has resulted in unnecessary criminalization of individuals and has led to a bloated criminal justice system. The enforcement of cannabis prohibition has disproportionately affected ethnic minorities and disadvantaged communities, perpetuating social inequalities. Moreover, criminalization has led to the creation of an underground market, empowering illicit drug dealers and increasing the risks associated with the unregulated cannabis trade.

 

In the field of cannabis prohibition in the United Kingdom, there have been influential individuals across various sectors and perspectives. One such figure is Baroness Molly Meacher, a crossbench member of the House of Lords. Meacher has been a vocal advocate for drug policy reform and has called for a shift towards a regulated and controlled cannabis market. She argues that regulation would allow for safer products, reduce criminality, and generate tax revenue for public services.

 

On the other side of the spectrum, there are influential figures such as Mary Brett, Chair of Cannabis Skunk Sense, who advocate for maintaining strict prohibition measures. Brett argues that cannabis poses significant risks to mental health, especially in young people, and that any relaxation of prohibition would lead to increased usage rates and associated harms.

 

Of course, a number of key British cannabis activists have played a crucial role in advocating for the legalization and decriminalization of cannabis in the United Kingdom. Some of these unsung heroes are just normal people who have dedicated their lives to tireless campaigning for the recognition of the medicinal benefits of cannabis, as well as the need for a more progressive and evidence-based approach to drug policy. Through their efforts, they have raised awareness about the potential economic and social benefits of a regulated cannabis industry while also highlighting the injustices and harms caused by the criminalization of cannabis users. They have organized protests, lobbied medicinal properties politicians, and engaged in public debates to challenge the stigma surrounding cannabis and push for policy reform. Their work has been instrumental in reshaping public opinion and influencing the government's approach to cannabis legislation in the UK.

 

The perspectives on cannabis prohibition range from those who emphasize the potential medical benefits of cannabis and advocate for its legalization for therapeutic purposes to those who view cannabis as a gateway drug and argue for its continued criminalization. These differing perspectives contribute to the ongoing debate surrounding cannabis prohibition in the United Kingdom.

 

Looking ahead, the landscape of cannabis prohibition in the United Kingdom is likely to evolve. The momentum for drug policy reform and cannabis legalization is growing globally, with several countries and states adopting more liberal approaches. The potential future developments in the United Kingdom could include further research into the medical benefits of cannabis, exploration of alternative regulatory models, and a shift towards more harm reduction strategies.

 

Even though we have made some significant steps forward, the exploration of cannabis prohibition in the United Kingdom is still a complex and somewhat taboo topic that is steeped in historical, social, and political dimensions. The impact of prohibition is huge and continues to affect people from all walks of life adversely. Thankfully, the influential individuals who have played a crucial role in shaping the discourse and advocating for their perspectives continue to push forward on our behalf. As attitudes towards cannabis continue to evolve, it is important to consider various viewpoints and prioritize evidence-based policy discussions for potential future developments related to cannabis prohibition in the United Kingdom. Still, there is a lot of hope that better things will come.

 

References

1) Aldridge, J., & Stevens, A. (2020). Cannabis policy, medicinal cannabis, and cannabis legalization in the UK: An overview. The British Journal of General Practice, 70(692), 6-7.

2) Bewley-Taylor, D., Jelsma, M., & Rolles, S. (2018). Cannabis regulation and the UN drug treaties: Strategies for reform. The Beckley Foundation.

3) Rolles, S., & Murkin, G. (2019). An overview of cannabis policy reforms in Europe. International Journal of Drug Policy, 68, 101-108.

Written and Published by Psy-23 in Weed World Magazine issue 168

Featured Image: Adobe Firefly